The Milgram Experiment Suggests TSA Staff Unlikely to Disobey Orders

11/29/2010
By Blue Collar Muse

Trust me buddy, this ain't no walk in the park for me either!

Image courtesy of Beartoons.com http://beartoons.com/tag/pat-down/

UPDATED: SEE END OF POST

Discussion of TSA’s recent actions has focused on procedures. But procedures do not implement themselves. Someone has to be comfortable with looking at naked pictures of strangers. Someone has to be comfortable searching breasts and testicles for likely nonexistent explosives. For every woman savaged and every child fondled, there was a person in a blue shirt willing to participate in the process. That is disturbing at best.

Front line TSA staff is caught between a rock and a hard place; between their public bosses and their bureaucratic overlords. They seem unaware of response options they have other than to develop a siege mentality. I remember a sign I saw in a DMV office complaining about the public’s bad attitude. The DMV concluded the public’s attitude in their office was unrelated to their DMV experience. The public was wrong to be offended and the DMV was free to behave as it pleased.

But being unaware of options doesn’t mean there aren’t any. They could quit. They could say, “I will not sexually assault and humiliate another human being in the name of security merely because I am told the measures are necessary.” Yet I know of no TSA employee, not one, who has opted to quit rather than obey orders.

TSA knows the pain, humiliation, frustration and anger they produce. They ignore it. Management says it’s “necessary” and staff implements with gusto. Nobody quits. Nobody objects. They all just hunker down. Any outrage they feel is over how they are treated and perceived.

It reminds me of The Milgram Experiment at Yale in the 1960s. Psychologist Stanley Milgram “… measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.” They were ordered to shock a person for giving wrong test answers. The voltage increased with each wrong answer. No actual shock was delivered. An actor in another room screamed and pounded on walls, feigning distress. Nevertheless, a huge percentage of participants delivered the maximum voltage.

Wikipedia quotes Milgram on the implications of the study,

I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation.

Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority. (emphasis added)

Milgram’s actual experiment, and variations on it, have been repeated since then including, it is reported, as recently as April of 2010. In every case, the results were the same.

To quote Milgram, “…the extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any length on the command of authority … most urgently demand[s] explanation.” Patriots talk of Liberty. Tyrants talk of security. Until we explain why Americans, whose nation was conceived in Liberty, agree to implement tyranny because they are told to; until we understand why Americans, whose Liberty comes from almighty God, surrender that Liberty without a fight because they are told to, Rights bought with Patriot swords will be stolen by tyrant pens. Unless we again become the Americans our Declaration and Constitution were written for we are doomed.

Not that this specific issue will break us, although it might. Who knows the exact location of the point of no return? But this is movement away from Liberty and into the counterfeit embrace of currently benevolent tyrants. When we have a choice between Liberty and tyranny, and we choose tyranny, our chains become more comfortable and more easily worn. Eventually tyrants need do nothing because we will have enslaved ourselves. Somewhere the Founders are weeping.

UPDATE #1 – The Pittsburgh, PA CBS affiliate KDKA Channel 2 ran this story 4 days ago, before I wrote my post. In an interview with an unidentified local TSA agent, the agent confirms that TSA staff are bothered by what they are being ordered to do, as were the Milgram subjects (one woman reportedly administered the shocks while personally in tears). The agent notes,

TSA officers don’t like the new aggressive pat-downs of passengers either.

“I truly feel that it is morally and ethically wrong to do it,” the agent noted. “This does not make flying safer. It’s just taking away American citizens rights.”

And it breaks the heart of some local TSA officers.

“Just the looks on their faces, some of them, the fear.”

“It goes back to, ‘Do upon others as you would wish others to do upon you.’ And I would not want that done to me, or my family, or my mother, or my grandmother.”

Such accounts only strengthen the argument. Here you have a person who believes what is being done is morally and ethically wrong, it produces fear in Americans and is ineffective in accomplishing the task for which it was implemented. He would not want any member of his family subject to it. Yet it appears he still works for the very organization that is responsible for implementing this horror and he personally will treat others in an immoral and unethical fashion – believing all the while that is exactly what he is doing – and will hope no one does to his mother what he is completely prepared to do to the mother of someone else. And, he then quotes the Golden Rule. Is he listening to himself??

Tags: , , , ,

7 Responses to The Milgram Experiment Suggests TSA Staff Unlikely to Disobey Orders

  1. Kate (29 comments) on 11/28/2010 at 23:57

    Why does the word 'kapo' pop into my head?

  2. Christopher Renner (1 comments) on 11/29/2010 at 00:24

    BCM, I couldn't agree more.

    I'd add the examples of the Third Reich, Stalin's Gulags, and Mao's conversion of ordinary organizations into prisons (see Chang and Halliday's "Mao:The Unknown Story for more details on this one).

    In none of the above cases did the evil authorities go out of their way to select guards with abnormal psyches – they relied instead on the systemic incentives for ordinary people to perpetrate evil acts. Such systemic evil was ended only by the destruction or massive reform of the system from outside, never by an uprising from within (though many good people behaved heroically in the face of such evils, they were the exception rather than the rule.)

  3. Blue Collar Muse (484 comments) on 11/29/2010 at 02:43

    @ Christopher -

    Actually, it appears that Milgram first undertook the study to try and answer the question of how and why normal Germans became the moral pariahs they did during WWII.

    I'm not sure he answered the question. But he did find that normal people have a propensity for evil that ought to horrify us. And it's not just one country or group. As you point out, there are Germans, Russians and Chinese. Then there are Cubans (Che), Cambodians (Pol Pot), Mexicans (the current cartel war) and we haven't even begun to touch on people from various Arab nations who behead the defenseless, murder their daughters and blow up groups of children.

    Those folks denying the sinful nature of man (biblical world view) in favor of the basic goodness of man (secular world view) have no answer for this behavior. Not that all men behave evilly. But rather, all men have the capacity for evil behavior. Why one man does and another does not is, as Milgram says, the question which most urgently needs answering.

  4. [...] Crossposted from Blue Collar Muse Tweet | Sphere: Related Content Share on: Facebook | digg_url = 'http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2010/11/29/the-milgram-experiment-suggests-tsa-staff-unlikely-to-disobey-orders/'; digg_title = 'The Milgram Experiment Suggests TSA Staff Unlikely to Disobey Orders'; digg_skin = 'compact'; | Reddit Category: 4th Amendment, Breaking News, Common Sense, Constitution Issues, History, Homeland Security, Individual Responsibility, Infrastructure Issues, Law Enforcement, Stanley Milgram, Terrorism · Edit · Tags: I was just following orders, The Milgram Experiment, TSA, Tyranny [...]

  5. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BlueCollarMuse, Susan K Southwick. Susan K Southwick said: BlueCollarMuse: Americans are outraged TSA's behavior. Anyone know a single TSA agent that quit over the new procedures? http://is.gd/hXtVd [...]

  6. Jim (2 comments) on 12/02/2010 at 02:59

    Sign the petition to abolish the TSA: http://abolishthetsa.net/sign-the-petition/

  7. [...] As I wrote a year ago, TSA cannot keep us safe and they will not keep us free. Further, the sort of human being that would willingly continue to work in a job where  they are required to routinely humiliate and assault innocents as part of their job simply because some bureaucrat tells them it is necessary is contemptible beyond knowing. These are not honorable Americans providing a valuable service. These are craven, corrupt, weak minded men devoid of character and integrity hiding behind the moder… [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Comments links could be nofollow free.

Please Consider a Hit On the Tip Jar if You Like My Stuff

Support BCM and Look Good Doing It

That Looks Interesting …

Recommended Reading

BCM VIDEO PICKS

Watch videos at Vodpod and politics videos and more of my videos